| |
 |
|
Today is:
Sat, 04 - Feb, 2012:
|
This day in 1906... Gladys Strum, pioneer in Saskatchewan and Canadian politics, was born
Read More...
|
Gladys Grace Mae Lamb was born on February 4, 1906 in Gladstone, Manitoba. At 16, she became a teacher in Saskatchewan, where she met her husband Warner Strum. Early in their marriage, Warner contracted tuberculosis and Gladys got an understanding of the deficiencies in Canada?s health care system. During travels to New Zealand, Strum gained an appreciation for that country?s progressive health care practices, which prompted her to get involved in the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) party in Canada. Although defeated in her bids for the legislature in 1938 and 1944 (the latter by six votes to Premier Patterson), Strum was actively involved in Canada?s first socialist government when Tommy Douglas became premier in the June 1944 election. The Saskatchewan CCF elected Strum president, making her the first woman president of a political party in Canada. The following year, she was elected the CCF Member of Parliament for Qu?Appelle, Saskatchewan, the only woman in the House of Commons during that session and the fifth woman MP elected to Ottawa. Among other achievements, Strum was successful in convincing the speaker of Parliament that women need no longer wear hats or handkerchiefs in the gallery. She was also famous for her line, ?No one has ever objected to women working; the only thing they have ever objected to is paying women for working.? Strum was defeated in 1949. However, she made her way back into politics in 1960 as a member of the Saskatchewan Legislature from Saskatoon. During that session she was proud to vote for the legislation that created Canada?s first socialized medical system. Strum died in Penticton, B.C. on August 15, 2005.
|


|
|
In Canada we get human rights legislation protections in the workplace, for services offered to us, when we seek housing, for affiliations & associations, and for publications & advertising. A respectful workplace ensures, at the minimum, these areas are protected.
Under various human rights legislation across Canada, employees get protection for the following characteristics (not all the same – there’s mixing and matching that goes on – check your own jurisdiction). When it comes to employment, an employer is prohibited from discriminating against people based on these characteristics, unless there is a good, solid, operational reason for doing so.
Age |
Physical Disability |
Ancestry |
Sex |
Criminal conviction |
Political belief |
Race |
Aboriginal origin |
Marital status |
Gender |
Social condition |
Family status |
Colour |
Sexual orientation |
Language |
Creed |
Mental disability |
Citizenship |
Religion |
Source of income |
Civil status |
Ethnicity |
Linguistic background |
Nationality |
Pregnancy |
Irrational fear of illness or disease |
Place of origin |
Although the courts have gotten rid of the distinction, for purposes of explaining, discrimination can be direct, or indirect. Direct is saying, “We don’t hire men.” Whereas indirect is to say, “we’ll hire anyone as long as they’re no taller than 5’ 7”.” That will clearly eliminate a lot of people, but it will have more of a negative impact on men than women because most men in Canada are 5’ 8” or taller.
The employer might not even have the intention of excluding men, but he impact is greater on men than women and that’s still discrimination. If the employer can come up with a good operational reason for doing so, then the height criteria can be upheld as legitimate.
To get a really respectful workplace, in addition to protecting people in obvious ways, we need to do a better job at subtle ways, such as:
- Double standards for women and men. In a male-dominated workplace is there tougher scrutiny for women than for men? Do men exclude women from the “tough” work as a way of protecting women? In a female-dominated workplace are the women free to take pot shots at men or make sexual jokes about men, while the reverse is dealt with severely?
Even today there are uncertainties about roles that men and women play, so sometimes our actions are unintentionally the wrong thing to do. Yet it’s important to assume men and women are equals until we get different information.
- Discomfort when interacting with persons with disabilities. Sometimes people are a bit nervous around persons with disabilities. Perhaps someone will say the wrong thing unintentionally, like “see you later” to a blind person. Or sometimes someone is not sure if a helping hand is appreciated or seen as pity. Other times, there may be awkwardness with communication, such as communicating with a deaf person or someone with a speech impairment.
A common way to avoid discomfort is to stay out of the picture altogether and have no or limited contact with certain individuals. However, the preferred way is to accept discomfort, and over time it will go away. And during that time, it will give people the opportunity to find commonality for work and personal times, and will ensure no one is kept from a workplace opportunity.
-
Easy targets. Lots of humour takes shots at certain people. And when those certain people aren’t around,
then we think we can get away with it. In our multicultural world, that’s tougher and tougher to do. The heritage of the person standing right beside you might not be obvious. And for sure, you have no idea who someone is married to, partnered up with, very close to, or otherwise related.
It’s also easy for us to take pot-shots at people from places we don’t understand. What harm is making fun of someone from Mombasa? Who’ll know? It’s become a very small world and it just doesn’t pay to make fun of easy targets.
- Giving into stereotypes. Stereotyping, or painting all people of certain characteristics, with the same brush, affects every person on this planet. Once we get it into our head that men are bad drivers (for example) then when we see a man driving badly, we go “uh-huh.” Whereas, we ignore and don’t hold onto the examples of bad women drivers. My father has the opposite stereotype and when I point out that he was wrong, he says, “well, he drives like a woman.” Which just goes to show that we’d rather hold onto our stereotypes than face reality.
Accept that we’re fed stereotypes from birth and therefore they will pop into our head regularly. But that doesn’t mean we have to act on them. And while you’re at it, make sure you challenge people when they stereotype others.
- Accept the impact of words. Many people say they can’t keep up with changing terminology. But when you think about it, language doesn’t change over night. We still have Indian Affairs within the government, but people often use “Aboriginal” as a term that includes First Nations, Métis and Inuit. If there is any uncertainty, listen to the terminology people use themselves and let that be your guide. If unclear, ask.
Most people are forgiving if they can tell we’re sincere. But don’t hold onto outdated and disrespectful terms, just to prove a point. Words have a huge impact on all of us, so don’t diminish that impact.

Previous: How to Have a Respectful Workplace
Next: Overcoming Barriers to a Respectful Workplace
|
|
|